O que se passou no julgamento de Julian Assange? (em actualização)

After an initial week of legal argument, the proceedings were adjourned and will continue with three weeks of evidence scheduled to begin on 18 May.

The most dangerous press freedom issue of 2020 is Trump’s prosecution of Julian Assange: Assange is not a popular figure, and has alienated people both inside and outside of the U.S. political establishment. But the facts of the case at hand are clear: Assange is being charged for speaking to a source and publishing information that source gave him. Whether or not you believe Assange is a “journalist,” the actions laid out in the indictment are virtually indistinguishable from common practices in newspapers around the country. It’s exactly why both The New York Times and The Washington Post — themselves no fans of Assange — have denounced the charges against him in the strongest terms.

Judge: Julian Assange Must Remain In Glass Box During Extradition Proceedings: The judge flatly rejected this request. She maintained Assange has had “no difficulty at all in attracting the attention of those who sit on the legal team” in the back row of the well. He communicated with them via notes during the week.

USA v Julian Assange: Extradition Day 4

Judge denies Assange’s request to sit with his lawyers

Prosecution claims Assange and WikiLeaks aren’t “political”

USA v Julian Assange: Extradition Day 3

Defense: Julian Assange cannot be extradited for a political offense

Assange can’t participate in his own defense

USA v Julian Assange: Extradition Day 2

Defense debunks US claims of reckless dump and Assange-Manning conspiracy

Guardian journalists to blame for unredacted cables’ release

Manning couldn’t have anonymized even if she cracked password

Manning’s conscience, not Assange, compelled her to blow the whistle

USA v Julian Assange: Extradition Day 1

[Crown Prosecution Service] CPS Makes Dramatic Claims, Without Evidence

CPS’ Arguments Would Put Newspapers At Risk

Assange’s Defense: This is an Abuse of Process

Trump Wants Assange’s “Head on a Pike”

Assange’s Views Make Him a Target

Chelsea Manning is a Whistleblower, Not Assange’s Co-Conspirator

Embassy Surveillance

US Congressman Offers Assange Pardon

US Prison Conditions Would Put Assange’s Life at Risk

19 November 2019. Mark this day. This is the day that Sweden finally closed the ‘preliminary’ investigation into the allegations against Julian Assange, a case resumed on 1 September 2010, after being summarily closed once before by Stockholm prosecutor Eva Finné. That’s nine years, two months, and nineteen days to do what Finné accomplished in twelve hours.

Deixe uma Resposta

Preencha os seus detalhes abaixo ou clique num ícone para iniciar sessão:

Logótipo da WordPress.com

Está a comentar usando a sua conta WordPress.com Terminar Sessão /  Alterar )

Google photo

Está a comentar usando a sua conta Google Terminar Sessão /  Alterar )

Imagem do Twitter

Está a comentar usando a sua conta Twitter Terminar Sessão /  Alterar )

Facebook photo

Está a comentar usando a sua conta Facebook Terminar Sessão /  Alterar )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.